Funding won on paper, delivered in orbit. Our technical writers and proposal architects know the ESA ecosystem from the inside – and write bids that are technically credible, compliantly structured, and easy for evaluation panels to score highly.

ESA proposal development
ESA funding instruments – Kick-Start activities, GSTP contracts, Fast Track proposals, Basic Technology Research Programme, and full ESA development contracts – each have their own structure, evaluation criteria, and unwritten expectations. Our consultants know the instruments in depth. We support the full proposal process from ITT analysis and compliance matrix development through to final document review and submission – ensuring your proposal is not only technically strong but structured to score.
EUMETSAT & EUSPA proposals
Beyond ESA, our consultants bring experience with EUMETSAT and EUSPA funding instruments and procurement processes. Each agency has its own culture, priorities, and evaluation approach – and proposals that work well for one do not always translate directly to another. We tailor our support to the specific instrument and agency, not to a generic template.
Technical writing & documentation
Great technical writing is precise, unambiguous, and readable. It anticipates the reader’s questions and answers them before they arise. Our technical writers produce engineering documentation that meets programme standards – interface control documents, system requirements specifications, test plans, technical notes, and milestone review documentation – written to the standard expected by ESA and other institutional customers.
Statement of work development A well-structured statement of work is the foundation of a well-managed contract. Our consultants develop SOWs that are clear, complete, and appropriately scoped – defining deliverables, milestones, and acceptance criteria in a way that protects both parties and gives the programme a solid contractual basis from the start.


Work package structuring & WBS development
Breaking a programme down into a logical, manageable work breakdown structure is both an art and a discipline. Our consultants develop WBS frameworks and work package descriptions that are realistic, traceable to programme objectives, and structured to support both technical management and cost control – giving your programme a clear architecture from day one.
Compliance matrix development
Every proposal response to an ITT must demonstrate compliance with the stated requirements. Our consultants develop structured compliance matrices that map every requirement to your proposed approach – clearly, completely, and in a format that makes the evaluator’s job straightforward. A clean compliance matrix signals organisational maturity and reduces the risk of losing points on procedural grounds.
Cost narrative & budget justification
The cost section of a proposal is often where marks are lost. Vague cost narratives, poorly justified rates, and unexplained assumptions raise red flags for evaluators. Our consultants develop cost narratives that are specific, credible, and aligned with your technical approach – giving evaluators confidence that your budget is realistic and your team understands what the work actually involves.
Proposal review & red team
If your team is writing the proposal in-house, Nord Space can provide an independent review – evaluating the document against the ITT requirements, identifying gaps and weaknesses, and providing structured feedback before submission. A fresh set of experienced eyes at the right moment can make a significant difference to the final score.
Proposal support engagements are typically time-critical by nature – ITT deadlines do not move. We are experienced at mobilising quickly, assessing what the proposal needs, and allocating the right resource to the right parts of the document in the time available.
Engagements range from full proposal development – where we take ownership of the document from ITT analysis through to final submission — to targeted support on specific sections, compliance review, or final editing and formatting. We work alongside your technical team, not instead of it, ensuring the proposal reflects your genuine capability and approach.
For organisations that submit proposals regularly, we also support the development of reusable proposal assets – standard company profiles, CV templates, capability statements, and past performance summaries – that reduce the effort required for each new submission.
We write proposals from the inside of the space industry, not from the outside looking in. Our consultants are engineers and programme managers who understand the technical content they are writing about – not communications professionals producing polished text around technology they do not understand. That distinction matters when evaluators are experts in the field and can immediately identify proposals that lack genuine technical depth.
We also bring institutional knowledge of how ESA and other agencies evaluate proposals – what they reward, what raises concerns, and where most proposals fall short. That knowledge shapes every proposal we touch, from the overall structure down to the choice of words in a single paragraph.